Power inductor tester                     


When building or repairing switching power supplies of all sorts, and also in many other situations, it's essential to be able to test and measure inductors and transformers. While there are some inductance meters available cheaply enough, they tell only part of what one needs to know, because they usually are unable to test an inductor for saturation current, let alone determine its linearity.

For that reason I built a simple gadget that in combination with a lab power supply and an oscilloscope will allow measuring inductance, see the magnetization curve of an inductor, find out saturation current, how sharp the saturation is, and see whether the inductor actually saturates, or is current-limited by resistance.

Magnetic components such as inductors and transformers are the least understood by most people doing electronics. So this little gadget also has a considerable educational value!

I built the first inductor tester of this type more than 20 years ago. That version never got a housing! It lived naked, free and healthy, all components in clear air. Then, about ten years ago, I built a more modesty-endowed one into a little plastic box. That's the version I'm finally publishing here!

This circuit can test inductors over the whole range of inductances usually seen in switching power supplies, inverters, chargers, motor controllers and the like, and it is capable of testing the saturation current up to about 100A.


As you can see, the circuit is very simple. There is a big bank of capacitors, a timer circuit using two 555 ICs that generates a train of variable length pulses, driving a MOSFET that applies these pulses to the inductor under test. The inductor current is sensed by a low value resistor,  the resulting voltage being applied to an oscilloscope, where the measurements are made.

The first of the 555 chips generates the repetition rate of the pulses, while the second 555 generates the actual pulse length applied to the inductor. There is a range switch, which selects the timing capacitors for both timers, and a potentiometer that fine-adjusts pulse length. In the slow range, the repetition rate is roughly 20Hz, which is about the slowest that allows getting a stable, easily readable trace on a typical scope. The pulse length is adjustable from roughly 300s to 10ms in this range. In the fast range the pulse length goes from 10s to those 300s, and the repetition rate is roughly 600Hz, which gives a good trace intensity at the sweep rates used for those pulse lengths. So, this circuit basically covers the pulse length range of 10s to 10ms, with appropriate repetition rates.

The output of the second 555 directly drives a high current MOSFET, which connects the capacitor bank to the inductor under test. The capacitors are conveniently charged to slightly over 10V from a current limited lab supply, so that the voltage applied to the inductor is as close as possible to 10V. This simplifies further calculations. But any supply voltage from 10 to 15V can be used.

The current sense resistor is 10mΩ, so that the output to the scope has a scale of 10 millivolt per ampere. A very narrow sample of the drive pulse is also coupled to the scope output through C18 and R7, to facilitate scope triggering at the start of each pulse.

Finally, there is a diode/resistor circuit to safely discharge the inductor after each pulse finishes, instead of frying the MOSFET!

Click on the schematic if you want a larger, better resolution version. And fix the MOSFET number, it's really an IRF3205, not 3105! It seems I misplaced the original schematic file, so I can't fix it myself... I used a 3105 at first, but later changed it to a 3205, which has much lower resistance.


I built the circuit on two pieces of perfboard. One holds the power circuit, prominently including the collection of electrolytic capacitors. I didn't buy these, but instead raided my collection of junked electronic boards, and robbed every 3300F capacitor I found! When you build your version, of course feel free to use any large capacitors you happen to have. The goal is to get roughly 40,000F or more, along with a very low ESR. A voltage rating of 16V is actually enough, and any more won't hurt.
    
The MOSFET and power diode don't neet heatsinks, thanks to the low duty cycle they work at.

The control circuit was assembled on a separate board, both for practical reasons, and to prevent magnetic interference from the high pulse current into the timer's high impedance areas. The range switch was mounted on this board, so that the whole board can be conveniently supported just by that switch.

This peek allows you to see the thick wires used to interconnect the capacitors, MOSFET, diode and power resistors. We want low ESR, right?

If you look carefully, you will notice that most wires are copper, but there is one shiny silvery wire. That's the 10mΩ resistor! It's a plain and simple piece of galvanized steel fencing wire! I think the gauge was AWG #16. Its temperature coefficient might not be the best, but it's cheap, available, easy to solder, and works well enough! I often use galvanized steel wire to make such low value power resistors.


And here you can see how the boards and other stuff fit in the little plastic project box - just barely.

I used a BNC connector for the scope output, and an RCA connector for the power supply input. Instead the connections to the inductor under test have no connectors at all. Instead I used thick, short stranded wires, which I tack-solder to the inductors. That's a lot better than using any clip connectors, when we want to push 100A pulses through them, and don't want much resistance!


So much for the construction of this gadget. Now let's go on to using it!



The inductor tester must be powered by a current-limited power supply, because otherwise it would be easy to far exceed the power dissipation capabilities of the discharge resistors, when setting the controls to a pulse length too long for a given inductor. The power supply should ideally be adjustable to slightly more than 10V, say, about 10.2V for low current inductors,  and up to 12V for the biggest ones. If such a supply isn't available, a fixed 12V will do, but then you will probably need a calculator instead of just your head, when doing the math.

The current capability of the supply should be about 1A. That will suffice for almost all tests you will want to do. But if you run out of juice when testing a very large inductor, you might want to increase the current limit to 2A or even 3A, but then do only very brief tests, or you will melt down the tester! On the other extreme of things, when you test tiny coils and transformers, this gadget can easily deliver enough current to vaporize thin wires and completely melt down small coils, so you really should use  a lab supply that has a current limit adjustable down to a low value. I like to use a 100mA limit when testing small components, and even that can be too much for the smallest ones!

The idea, in any case, is that if you set a pulse time that's too long, the power supply should go into current limit well before your inductor under test gets damaged, or the tester itself lets out its magic smoke!

The scope needs to have a calibrated scale, DC response, and be able to trigger on the positive edge. Essentially every scope, except absolute antiques from the time of WW2 and before, meets these requirements.


This is the complete waveform displayed on the scope. It begins with a positive ramp, as the current in the coil increases while the circuit applies 10V to it. Typically this ramp will not be linear - it can have one, two or even more bends in it, caused by saturation and other nonlinear effects of the core, by the winding resistance, and even by the tester.

Then the ramp ends, which results in a negative pulse coming both from the drive circuit and MOSFET capacitances. Note that this isn't the inductive discharge of the coil! That one is routed away from the scope. Although some of the inductor discharge current might be magnetically coupling to the scope output.

And then comes a rest time, after which the cycle repeats. If you look very carefully, you can see the positive trigger pulse at the start of the second ramp. The one at the first ramp is hidden by the first grid line!

You should start testing an inductor by connecting the inductor (soldering it), setting the tester to the shortest pulse length, then switching on the power, adjusting the scope to see at least the full first ramp and some area around, and then slowly increase the pulse length until you see the ramp bending upwards. This is the saturation point of the inductor, and it usually makes little sense to test at any higher current. Don't crank up the pulse length much further, or you will get really large current pulses, and possibly some smoke.

What you have to do now is adjust the scope to see the interesting part of the curve in good detail. That's the entire ramp until the saturation point, in most cases.


Let's start with this animal. It's the filter choke of a multivoltage half bridge forward converter, a.k.a. PC power supply. It's wound on a toroidal core made from very dense, fine grained, powdered iron. These cores have a permeability of around 70 to 100, which is the highest available from powdered iron.

For the test, I connected only one of its windings. I think it's the 12V winding. The other windings were left open.


This is the ramp I got. The scope is set for 100mV and 10s per division. What we can see is that after some ringing where the ramp starts, given by stray capacitance, the ramp starts at a certain angle, then after about 5s gets slightly less steep (meaning the inductance increased at that current level!), and then after about 30s the trace gets steeper again (inductance is reducing at that current level). This reduction of inductance continues, and is known as the saturation knee. Eventually the trace gets straight again, much steeper than at the beginning. It's here where the core is completely saturated, and we have basically the same inductance left as if the winding had been made on thin air instead of an iron core.

The saturation of this core is very soft, indicated by the soft knee, having a large radius, compared to the size of the whole ramp.

Zero voltage is at the line one division up from the bottom. If we take as saturation limit the middle of the knee, which is roughly 50s after the beginning of the ramp, this is a voltage of 150mV. Considering that the inductor tester has a 10mΩ sensing resistor, this means a coil current of 15A. So we can say that this inductor saturates very roughly at 15 amperes flowing in its 12V winding. By counting the number of turns and multiplying that by this current, we can arrive at a certain amount of ampereturns that will saturate this particular core, but we have to keep in mind that with the saturation of this core being so soft, it's hard to say at which level we will consider it to be saturated!


To measure the inductance of this winding, the scope settings above are not good enough. The inductance we usually want to measure is the amount before saturation, and that part of the trace is too small to allow precisely reading the screen.

So, first we reduce the pulse length,  to finish the pulse before the core saturates. The scope settings in this shot are still the same, just the pulse length was reduced.


And then we readjust the scope to make good use of the screen. In this case the settings are 10mV and 2s per division.

The inductance that's most meaningful in power electronics is the one at medium currents, well before saturation, but not at very low current. Anyway this simple inductor tester has some parasitic effects at the very start of the pulse, given by the gate charge pulse of the MOSFET, so it's better to avoid that area. So I will take the last 5 horizontal divisions of this trace, where it is a nice straight ramp. This is 10s, and 2.2 vertical divisions, which is 22mV, representing 2.2A. So we know that with 10V applied, this inductor lets the current grow by 2.2A in 10s. And now we can apply the definition of the Henry:

H = V s  A

Inserting our values,

10V 0.00001s 2.2A = 0.000045H

So the inductance is 45H.

Since it's easy enough to count the number of turns of this winding, we can now calculate both the AL value and the saturation ampereturns for this core, and those are the main bits of data needed to design any coil using it! Just the core loss is a separate entity that this tester does not measure easily. Still, you can take any unknown core, wind a test coil on it, and use this tester to determine the core's main characteristics. That's a very useful thing to do!



Let's try another guinea pig. This slightly injured but still perfectly functional thing is a common mode choke, intended to be used in noise filters at the input of switching power supplies. They are usually wound on high permeability ferrite, which has a strong resistive (lossy) component in the RF range, producing good absorption of unwanted RF signals.

Like in the case above, I connected just one winding.


This shot was made at 20mV and 100s per division. The very sharp, well defined saturation knee is immediately obvious. Before the knee, the ramp has a very low slope, indicating a high inductance. After the knee, the inductance is very much lower.

Just for fun, let's calculate how much inductance there is, when the core is saturated:

In 5 vertical divisions we get 1.8 horizontal ones. That's 100mV, meaning 10A, in 180s. The applied voltage is of course 10V, defined by the lab power supply. So:

10V 0.00018s 10A = 0.00018H, or 180H.

Remember that this is the inductance when the core is saturated!


Now I have reduced the pulse length to include the saturation knee but stop after it, and I have reset the scope to  1mV and 50s per division. We can see that significant saturation starts at 1 division up from the zero line (0.1A), the knee is centered roughly on 1.6 divisions (0.16A), and the core is totally saturated at roughly 0.4A in this coil.
 
Over the usable part of the ramp, before saturation, we get about 0.6 vertical divisions in 5 horizontal ones. That means 0.06A in 250s, which results in roughly 42mH. Note this is millihenry, while all inductances mentioned above were much smaller, and indicated in microhenry!

So, we can say that a single winding of this common mode choke has an inductance of 42mH, has hard saturation at roughly 160mA, and when saturated it has 180H left - which means that the inductance drops by a factor of 233 due to saturation!

This behavior is typical of inductors wound on high permeability ferrite cores, without air gaps. In fact the sharp saturation of this choke is an indication that the residual airgap, which results from imperfectly polished mating surfaces of the core halves, is very small, indicating good quality of the core finish.
 
Just to prevent risking any wrong conclusions on the side of my readers: The normal way a common mode choke is used consists of connecting its two windings in series with the two poles of the power line. So, all the big current flows through the two windings in opposite senses, canceling the magnetic flux. For this reason this common mode choke can take several amperes in its normal operation mode, without getting even close to saturation. The actual working current is limited by heating of the wire, and not by the core! Also the choke will oppose almost no inductance to such normal mode (differential mode) currents. But it will oppose its full non-saturated inductance to low frequency common mode signals, and at RF it will be lossy, absorbing RF noise.
 


Here we have our next guinea pig: A homemade tape-wound transformer intended for a 12V to 220V inverter. It has a 212V primary and a 45V secondary. Several push pull converter blocks, each using one of these transformers, are connected with their secondaries all in series.

For this test, I used the secondary winding.


The trace resembles that of the common mode choke. After all, both use high permeability, ungapped ferrite cores! But one difference is obvious: The knee is softer. This is due mainly to this low cost core having less well polished seating surfaces, so that there is a significant, irregular air gap. As a result, granules of ferrite actually touching at the joint of the core halves will take lots of flux, and saturate first, while those granules separated by some air will only then start taking more flux, and saturate a little later. The whole core will saturate well after that. This spreads the saturation phenomenom over a wider current range, extending and softening the knee.

Another difference is less obvious:  The ratio of the inductances in saturated and non-saturated conditions is a little less extreme than for the common mode choke. This is because the ferrite used for this transformer has a slightly lower permeability.
 
And of course the absolute values of inductance and saturation current are different, due to totally different turn numbers and core dimensions.

The inductance measured in a transformer like this defines the magnetizing current it will take, when a certain voltage and frequency are applied. This magnetizing current needs to be kept below the saturation level, and at any frequency above roughly 10kHz it needs to be kept even lower, in order to avoid excessive core loss and heating. The actual current carried by each winding can be very much larger, because the primary and secondary currents cancel out, except for that magnetizing current.




Let's take this last test coil, to illustrate a few more points. This is an FT-240-61 toroid, made from low permeability ferite, wound with a quick and dirty trifiliar winding that I used to generate a balanced signal for an equally quick and dirty test, some time ago. Now I pulled it out of my junk box, and connected the three wires in series. This stranded wire is quite thin, so it has a significant resistance at high currents.


This is the curve it gives. It's nice, because it allows us to see a pretty linear ramp at the beginning, then a moderately soft saturation knee, then a steeper ramp in the saturation area, and then a roll-off toward a horizontal line. This last bend is caused by the wire resistance. The scope was set for 200mV per division, meaning 20A per division, so the trace ends at a current of roughly 72A, at which the thin stranded wire is seriously limiting the current due to its resistance. It looks like the curve would level off at roughly 80A. Knowing that there are 10V applied, this means that the total resistance of the winding is 0.125Ω, which seems quite reasonable for the length and size of wire used. Which shows that my little gadget can even measure coil resistance, in a more fancy way than using a multimeter!
 
Note that the saturated and unsaturated inductances are far less different than in the other ferrite cores above. That's because of the low permeability of this ferrite, barely a bit higher than that of the powdered iron core at the beginning!

There is no need to worry that this crooked curve could distort the RF signals, when using this core for a high power balun, as is often done. Due to the high core losses at RF, all signals are kept to very low flux levels, so low that they would be hidden in the blurry spot at the very beginning of this trace! At that low flux level, the balun is completely linear, for all practical purposes.

Audio transformers instead, which often use quite high flux densities, do suffer from distortion introduced by core nonlinearity.  The core magnetizing curve directly affects the magnetizing current, and through several effects this impacts the signals in an audio transformer. That's the main reason why HiFi sound reproduction became so much better when tubes, with their almost inevitable transformers, were put in the museum, and replaced by transformerless solid state circuits. Tube audio fans will of course tell you the opposite story, in the line that tube equipment sounds better, because of the transformer and triode distortions! What sounds more enjoyable, the clean audio or the distorted one, is a matter of taste... But that transformerless equipment has less distortion, is an easily measurable and audible fact.


Well, enough playing for now. If you want to keep playing and testing inductors, learning how they work, build your inductor tester and use it!



Back to homo ludens electronicus.